I don't throw around the word "fan" lightly. But when I read Spyros Koutlelos's piece on AI and small research agencies in APAC, I forwarded it to my team the same day. We are huge fans of his work, and this article is exactly the kind of thinking the market research industry needs more of.
Here's why it landed so hard for me.
I didn't come up through a global network firm with a technology budget and a development team. I came up doing the actual work โ recruiting participants, running screeners, sitting across from respondents and figuring out what they were really telling us versus what they said out loud. That's where I learned market research. Not in a boardroom. In the field.
And for years, the frustration wasn't the work. The frustration was the infrastructure gap.
The Ceiling Was Always the Infrastructure
Spyros frames this perfectly in the context of APAC โ a region that has always leapfrogged legacy systems rather than inheriting them. But the dynamic he's describing isn't geography-specific. The same structural disadvantage he's talking about in Jakarta and Manila existed for every small boutique research firm operating outside the big network agencies. You either bought expensive platforms designed for enterprise clients with enterprise budgets, or you competed on relationships and expertise alone and accepted a permanent ceiling on your scale.
That ceiling is what I built EpikInsight around. Not to accept it โ to work around it, and now, finally, to dismantle it.
"The constraint was never the ideas. It was always the infrastructure."
โ Spyros Koutlelos, Webcall International ResearchThe Inflection Point Is Real
What Spyros is identifying as the inflection point โ AI coding tools that let domain experts build their own infrastructure without a development team โ is something I've watched arrive in real time. The researchers who know what needs to be built can now actually build it. The bottleneck between expertise and execution is gone. That's not a small thing. That's a fundamental restructuring of who gets to compete at what level.
For a boutique participant recruitment firm, this matters in very specific ways. Screener logic that used to require a developer can now be built and iterated by the person who actually writes the screeners. Recruitment workflows that were previously manual and time-intensive can be systematized without buying an enterprise platform that wasn't designed for how we work. The customization that big clients expect but that only big agencies could afford to deliver โ that gap is closing fast.
The Goal Isn't Speed. It's Structure.
Spyros makes a point that I think deserves to be repeated louder: the goal isn't to do the same things faster. It's to build something structurally different. An AI-native organization that encodes its own domain expertise into proprietary tools, compounding its advantage with every project.
That's the play. Not automation for its own sake. Institutionalized expertise.
The people who are going to win this next period in market research are not the ones with the biggest legacy infrastructure to protect. They're the ones who built their knowledge the hard way โ in the field, across real projects, with real respondents โ and who now finally have the tools to operationalize what they know at scale.
Where We Stand
I've spent my career in this industry. The constraint was never the ideas or the expertise. It was always the infrastructure.
That constraint is gone. And I'm not wasting the moment.
If you haven't read Spyros's original piece, stop here and go read it. Then come back and think seriously about what it means for how you're building โ or not building โ right now. The Infrastructure Barrier Is Gone โ

